Heatwave scorches THIS Indian state, seven districts record over 40 degrees C temperatures
The mercury is likely to fall from March 19 with the IMD predicting rain and thunderstorms in the region.
Trump visa policy ‘far more restrained’ than Biden policy targeting Israelis that flew under the radar: expert
Long before Democrats and liberal activists accused Trump of trampling on the rights of pro-Hamas visa holders in the U.S., the Biden administration rolled out a visa-restriction policy targeting Israelis that was riddled with political bias and vague language, but received little resistance or protest, a legal expert told Fox News Digital. “One is a valid judgment,” legal expert and senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation’s Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom, Eugene Kontorovich, explained of President Donald Trump’s restrictions and revocations of visas belonging to pro-Hamas students in the U.S. “The other was just using the visa system to punish one’s political enemies,” he continued of a 2023 Biden visa policy. The Trump administration is in the midst of working to revoke visas and green cards belonging to pro-Hamas students in the U.S. who participated in the widespread anti-Israel protests and riots that rocked college campuses during the last school year. The effort has been met with backlash from Democrats who say Trump is attacking the First Amendment rights of individuals who protested Israel. PRO-HAMAS ACTIVIST’S DEPORTATION NOT A ‘FREE SPEECH’ MATTER AND LAW IS ON TRUMP’S SIDE: EXPERTS Kontorovich spoke to Fox News Digital Wednesday in a phone interview where he explained that Trump’s actions are not only within his legal bounds but also “far more restrained” than previous administrations’ “politicized visa” policies, including a Biden policy that restricted Israelis. The Biden administration announced in December 2023, just months after war broke out in Israel on October 7, 2023, that it would restrict visas to those believed to have undermined peace and stability in the West Bank. The restriction was a part of the Biden administration’s efforts to achieve a two-state solution for peace in Israel and Palestine, the New York Times reported at the time. COLUMBIA ANTI-ISRAEL PROTEST RINGLEADER MAHMOUD KHALIL TO REMAIN DETAINED IN LOUISIANA “Today, the State Department is implementing a new visa restriction policy targeting individuals believed to have been involved in undermining peace, security, or stability in the West Bank, including through committing acts of violence or taking other actions that unduly restrict civilians’ access to essential services and basic necessities,” the State Department said in a press release in December 2023. “Immediate family members of such persons also may be subject to these restrictions.” In February 2024, Biden signed an executive order imposing sanctions on “persons undermining peace, security, and stability in the West Bank” as he decried “extremist settler violence” in the West Bank. Under the order, sanctioned individuals had their bank accounts frozen and their credit cards canceled and were restricted from conducting basic life activities. TRUMP VOWS ANTI-ISRAEL ACTIVIST MAHMOUD KHALIL WAS ‘FIRST ARREST OF MANY TO COME’ Kontorovich explained that the language of the announcement was vague and allowed for the Biden administration to punish individuals who disagreed with the administration’s policies on a two-state solution. “The executive order of Biden says, we can ban people who disagree with our notion, even if they don’t encourage or participate in violent activities. Whereas there is nothing in U.S. law that says the two-state solution is the be-all and end-all.” JUDGE BLOCKS ANTI-ISRAEL COLUMBIA AGITATOR MAHMOUD KHALIL FROM DEPORTATION AS POLITICIANS COME TO HIS DEFENSE “Half the congressmen in Congress probably don’t support the two-state solution, whereas Hamas is a designated foreign terror,” he continued. “Opposing the two-state solution, not a designated terror organization. Hamas kidnaps and rapes people, murders people. Opponents of the two-state solution don’t do that.” Despite the alleged political motivation behind the policy, it was within Biden’s legal bounds, as presidents have broad power to deny entry to foreign nationals. Kontorovich called the Biden-era visa policy a “Jew ban” — which plays off of the “Muslim ban” title for the travel ban policies under the first Trump administration — as it targeted “Israeli Jews based on political viewpoints that are extremely common amongst Israeli Jews.” ICE AGENTS ARREST ANTI-ISRAEL ACTIVIST WHO LED PROTESTS ON COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY CAMPUS FOR MONTHS The international law expert and George Mason Antonin Scalia Law School professor continued that Democrats and activist groups did not sound the alarm or speak out against the Biden visa policy at the time, noting that the “Biden administration was doing so many bad things to Israel, this was kind of not at the top of the list” for rebuke. He added that despite the silence in 2023, Democrats this year are “going to bat for a guy who was working with a group that openly and actively supported murderous foreign terrorist organizations,” referring to Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil, who was a top pro-Hamas protest organizer on campus in 2024. “It just shows you how much this outrage is manufactured,” he said. “Also, how what Trump is doing is not some kind of new wild, crazy Trumpian thing. It’s actually far more restrained than politicized visa policies of prior administrations. Those just didn’t get the manufactured outrage.” Democrats and activists have slammed the Trump administration over the ICE detention of Khalil at his Columbia University-owned apartment in Manhattan March 8. The Department of Homeland Security said he was a former Columbia graduate student who “led activities aligned to Hamas, a designated terrorist organization.” Khalil helped lead the anti-Israel protest that plagued the campus in April 2024, including as a negotiator for radical agitators students on campus as they set up a tent encampment and took over an academic building, Hamilton Hall. He served as a leader of a group called Columbia United Apartheid Divest, which demanded that Columbia completely divest from Israel amid the country’s war with Hamas that began on Oct. 7, 2023. The group said its main goal was to “challenge the settler-colonial violence that Israel perpetrates with the support of the United States and its allies,” according to an op-ed published in the Columbia Spectator in November 2023. DHS additionally reported that Khalil “led activities aligned to Hamas, a designated terrorist organization.” The 47th president signed an executive order in January, putting pro-Hamas protesters in the U.S. on student visas on notice that
Mbappe double at Villarreal takes Real Madrid top of LaLiga
Kylian Mbappe’s first half brace in the 2-1 away win against Villareal moves Madrid three points clear atop the standings. Kylian Mbappe has scored twice to help Real Madrid fight back to beat Villarreal 2-1 and move provisionally top of the LaLiga standings. The hosts opened the scoring in the seventh minute on Saturday when Alex Baena’s corner was deflected by Aurelien Tchouameni, allowing Juan Foyth to score from close range. Real Madrid levelled 10 minutes later when Mbappe pounced on Brahim Diaz’s blocked shot and the ball landed at his feet for a close-range finish. Six minutes later, the French international scored his 20th league goal of the season, latching on to Lucas Vazquez’s through ball and slotting home. Mbappe had a chance to complete his hat-trick in the second half when he latched on to Vinicius Jr’s through ball, but the offside flag was raised. “It’s the last time we’ll play a game with less than 72 hours’ rest,” said coach Carlo Ancelotti, referring to Wednesday’s gruelling Champions League shootout win over city rivals Atletico Madrid. Real top the table on 60 points, three clear of second-placed Barcelona, who have a game in hand after their match with Osasuna was postponed last week, and face third-placed Atletico on Sunday. Real Madrid’s Kylian Mbappe scores his second goal against Villarreal at Estadio de la Ceramica, on March 15, 2025 [Aitor Alcalde/Getty Images] Adblock test (Why?)
Norris beats Verstappen at F1 Australian GP in Melbourne
McLaren’s Lando Norris begins the 2025 F1 season with victory ahead of Max Verstappen in an eventful and rain-affected Australian Grand Prix. McLaren’s Lando Norris swept to victory in a wet and wild Australian Grand Prix, holding off defending champion Max Verstappen in a white-knuckle finish to a Formula One season opener littered with crashes and safety cars. George Russell of Mercedes was third on the slippery Albert Park circuit, where only 14 of the 20 cars finished in the treacherous conditions in Sunday’s race. Norris, the preseason favourite for the driver’s title, started the F1 season as he finished the last at Abu Dhabi, with victory from pole. His teammate Oscar Piastri started second on the grid but finished ninth, his dreams of becoming the first home driver to claim victory or a consolation podium were ended with a skid into the grass. Lewis Hamilton’s debut for Ferrari proved a damp squib with the Briton finishing 10th, two places behind teammate Charles Leclerc. Norris, who claimed his first win in Melbourne and the fifth of his career, said it had been a difficult race with Verstappen breathing down his neck. Advertisement “It was amazing. Tough race, especially with Max (Verstappen) behind me,” he said. “I was pushing, especially in the last two laps. It was a little bit stressful, not going to lie. “This time we got it right and ended on top so I’m happy.” Norris now leads the F1 drivers’ championship for the first time in his career. He is the first McLaren driver to lead the championship since Hamilton after the 2012 Canadian Grand Prix. McLaren’s Lando Norris of Great Britain, left, leads Max Verstappen of Red Bull during the Australian Grand Prix on March 16, 2025, in Melbourne, Australia [Clive Rose/Getty Images] Adblock test (Why?)
Is Trump the end of the international rules-based order?
After more than a year of Israeli bombing, tens of thousands of Palestinian deaths, and a humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza, the world was largely united in saying “enough is enough”. United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) resolution 12667 in December was clear in its demand: An immediate ceasefire in Gaza. Countries as diverse as Vietnam, Zimbabwe and Colombia echoed that call. And yet, bucking that consensus were nine “no” votes – chief among them, as is typical when it comes to resolutions calling for Israel to adhere to international law or human rights, was the United States. The US has provided unwavering support to Israel throughout its war on Gaza, even as Israel faces accusations of genocide at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and its prime minister has an International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant to his name. Gaza had made the US choose openly between adhering to the international “rules-based order” – the system of laws and norms established in the wake of World War II to avoid wars and foster democracy – it claims to uphold, or support Israel. It chose the latter. Advertisement The Democratic administration of former US President Joe Biden, which was in the last days of its tenure when it voted “no” on the UNGA resolution, repeatedly claimed to be acting in defence of the rules-based order – not least in its condemnation of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine – in all matters other than those related to Israel and Palestine. When it came to matters not related to Israel or Palestine, the Democratic administration of former US President Joe Biden – which was in its last days when it voted “no” in the UNGA – claimed to act in defence of the rules-based order, especially in repeatedly condemning Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The US supported Ukraine as a country defending itself from an unjust invasion by a neighbour. In the Asia Pacific, it strengthened partnerships with allies threatened by potential Chinese expansionism, particularly Taiwan. But the first few weeks of US President Donald Trump’s second term upended all expectations. Now, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy finds himself berated in the Oval Office by Trump and his Vice President JD Vance, who sent out friendly feelers to Russia. US Vice President JD Vance speaks at the 61st Munich Security Conference on February 14, 2025, in Munich, Germany [Sean Gallup/Getty Images] Greenland, Panama and one of the US’s closest allies, Canada, find themselves the subject of Trump’s imperialist rhetoric. Trump has made clear that the old rules are out of the window. His posture towards Ukraine and his push for trade tariffs against allies is part of an isolationist, “America First”, mentality – which sees the world’s issues as not the US’s business, and international cooperation as weak. Advertisement Vance’s words at the Munich Security Conference in February – insinuating that European governments are authoritarian for not working with far-right parties – highlighted that Trump’s Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement doesn’t see Europeans as allies, at least not if European leadership remains liberal and internationalist in nature. Is this a sign of things to come? Is the US moving away from its allies and abandoning the rules-based order? And was the rules-based order ever really international – or merely focused on furthering the interests of the West? The short answer: Trump’s current trajectory could mark the final end to a world order that has long faced accusations of double standards and selective application of international law. European leaders are already saying they need to defend themselves and the US cannot be trusted. Analysts who spoke to Al Jazeera believe that the rules-based order cannot survive this onslaught in its current form – it would have to adapt and change. The rules-based order At its heart, what we call the rules-based order is the bedrock of much of modern international relations. In intention, it is supposed to maintain stability, cooperation and a degree of predictability in the way states deal with each other. Emerging from World War II and the Holocaust, the rules-based order, underpinned by international law and multinational organisations like the UN, was intended to embody shared principles of sovereignty, self-determination, territorial integrity and dispute resolution through diplomacy rather than force. Advertisement Its supporters, such as the US and Europe, argued the system promotes peace, democracy, human rights and economic stability. But it has its critics: Global South countries say its institutions are biased in favour of the West. That may be because the system emerged at a time when the US was able to cement itself as the global hegemon. Throughout its history, the rules-based order has been supported by the US’s economic, diplomatic and military heft. That only increased after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War in 1991, when the US’s only real challenger for international dominance threw in the towel. Imperial thinking The first few weeks of the second Trump presidency feel far away from that post-Cold War high, when Francis Fukuyama argued, in The End of History and the Last Man, that liberal democracy had won in the battle of global ideologies. Palestinian boys near the destroyed headquarters of the UN agency for Palestinian refugees at Nur Shams refugee camp near Tulkarem in the occupied West Bank on November 2, 2024 [Jaafar Ashtiyeh/AFP] Now, Trump tells Zelenskyy he does not “have the cards right now” in his country’s fight against Russian invasion, and demands a deal for Ukraine’s natural resources in return for support. For Europe, and the US under Biden, Ukraine’s battle was about sovereignty and defending democracy against autocracy. Those arguments do not interest Trump – who portrays himself as a “peacemaker”, but a realist one, who understands that might is right. Advertisement An indifference to the principle of sovereignty can also be seen in Trump’s Gaza “plan”, which would involve the US takeover of the territory – and ethnically cleansing the Palestinians who live there. While he recently appeared to walk back
Tennessee bill allows schools to deny enrollment for illegal migrants, proposal panned as unconstitutional
Tennessee state lawmakers introduced a bill to allow school districts and law enforcement agencies to deny enrollment to illegal migrant students. S.B. 836 states that a law enforcement agency or public charter school “may enroll, or refuse to enroll, a student who is unlawfully present in the United States.” Republican Sen. Bo Watson, who sponsored the bill, said the proposal aims to save the state money. The bill was amended to give school districts the option to charge tuition for a student’s enrollment rather than making it a requirement, according to Fox Chattanooga. THREE MORE STATES JOIN TREND OF PASSING UNIVERSAL SCHOOL CHOICE “This legislation says, if you are not able to prove your lawful residence here, a local LEA may charge you tuition for attendance, which addresses the physical nature of this legislation. This is not about denying education to those students,” Watson said, according to the outlet. But the bill contradicts the current law affirmed by the 1981 U.S. Supreme Court decision Plyler v. Doe, which ruled that states provide funding for any student seeking a public education, regardless of their immigration status. Immigration attorney Brittany Faith criticized the bill as unconstitutional and said it was proposed to challenge the Plyler v. Doe ruling. “It’s blatantly unconstitutional. They’ve been pretty honest that that’s their goal, is to set this up as a challenge to Plyler v. Doe,” Faith told Fox Chattanooga. TN LAWMAKER PROPOSES SENDING ILLEGAL MIGRANTS ACCUSED OF MINOR CRIMES TO SANCTUARY CITIES INSTEAD OF DEPORTING Faith also took issue with the option for schools to charge tuition, citing that Tennessee’s tax structure is sales-tax-based. “Because of that, they’re paying the same amount of taxes that go towards the public education system that somebody who is in legal status does,” she said.
Maharashtra: Man suffers heart attack while driving car, rams into multiple vehicles in Kolhapur
The driver, identified as Dheeraj Patil (55), was returning home from work when he suffered a heart attack
‘Love for Bharat unites us all’: Amit Shah gifts guitar to Mizoram’s 7-year-old singing prodigy
Hnamte, a young singing sensation from Mizoram, first gained nationwide attention in 2020 when a video of her singing ‘Maa Tujhe Salaam’ went viral.
Gold smuggling case: BIG action against Ranya Rao’s stepfather, DGP K Ramachandra Rao; sent on…
The order for K Ramachandra Rao — the Director General of Police (Karnataka State Police Housing Corporation) — was issued on Saturday (March 15). No reason for the leave was specified in the order.
Atletico Madrid vs Barcelona – LaLiga: Team news, start time, how to follow
Who: Atletico Madrid vs BarcelonaWhat: Spanish LaLigaWhere: Metropolitano Stadium, Madrid, SpainWhen: Sunday at 9pm (20:00 GMT) Follow Al Jazeera Sport‘s live text and photo commentary stream. Atletico Madrid doesn’t have much time to linger on its painful Champions League exit against Real Madrid. Another crucial game awaits on Sunday, this time against Barcelona in the tight battle for the Spanish league title. Al Jazeera looks ahead to one of the biggest games in the Spanish football calendar: How are Atletico Madrid and Barcelona faring in LaLiga? Atletico are a point behind Barcelona in second and four points behind leaders Madrid in the three-way fight for the trophy. Real have played two more games than Barca and one more than Atletico. So Diego Simeone’s team can hardly afford to lose on Sunday but must quickly get over another excruciating defeat to their fierce crosstown rival in the Champions League on Wednesday. Atletico Madrid’s Julian Alvarez scores a penalty during a penalty shootout that is later disallowed after a VAR review due to a double touch in the Champions League match against Real Madrid on March 12, 2025 [Susana Vera/Reuters] What happened in Atletico’s Champions League Madrid derby? Atletico lost in a penalty shootout to Real after Julian Alvarez’s spot kick was disallowed for a double touch. Only a video review spotted the first contact when Alvarez’s support foot slid and gently nudged the ball before he impacted it with his other foot and sent it into the net. Advertisement “Honestly, it isn’t easy to get over the way we lost this tie. We can’t lie to ourselves,” Simeone said after the match. Where could the match be won on Sunday? Simeone acknowledged that Barcelona could have an advantage both physically and emotionally after Hansi Flick’s side got an extra day’s rest after their victory against Benfica on Tuesday to advance to the Champions League quarterfinals. “We face a great rival on Sunday. I imagine the Barcelona players were wanting our game to go as long as it could, to reach penalties,” Simeone said. “We will arrive tired and beat up after having fought hard in a tie that demanded we give it our all, but we will throw everything we have left” at Barcelona. 🤩 Amazing memories from our last LaLiga game vs FC Barcelona pic.twitter.com/ztLACCN3bL — Atlético de Madrid (@atletienglish) March 15, 2025 How has the rivalry panned out recently? Atletico have confounded Barcelona twice this season. Late goals by Alexander Sorloth snatched a 2-1 win at Barcelona in the league and a 4-4 draw in the opening leg of their Copa del Rey semifinal. But Barcelona have gone unbeaten in 17 straight games across all competitions since that loss to Atletico in late December. Atletico will also host Barcelona next month to decide their Copa del Rey semifinal. What is Barcelona’s take on the match? Flick warned his Barcelona stars they need to focus to avoid crumbling against Atletico Madrid as they have in their previous two meetings this season. “We have had really two great matches, and of course, we have to be focused from the beginning to the end of the match,” Flick told reporters on Saturday. Advertisement “In the first match, at the end of the match, we were not so focused like we can be, and also the second match was [the same] in the beginning and also at the end, so we have to take care about that. “When you make mistakes, Atletico can hurt you, and this is what we have to defend against.” No days off 💪 #AtletiBarça pic.twitter.com/iuQRV2QRWk — FC Barcelona (@FCBarcelona) March 15, 2025 How will Flick solve the Olmo-Gavi headache? Dani Olmo is seemingly ahead of Gavi in the pecking order for the attacking midfield spot for Barca. Gavi and Barca defender Alejandro Balde were not included in the Spain squad that will face the Netherlands in the Nations League quarterfinals next week, but the Barca coach hailed both players. “[Gavi] came from a huge injury, and he’s 20 years old, and now at the moment, he is, I think, not the first [choice] … a more difficult situation, but he’s doing great,” Flick said. “At the moment our midfield is doing really good. I’m happy he’s here, and I think he will play many, many years for this amazing club and be one of the superstars here. “He can improve a lot. He will do this. His attitude is unbelievably good. He’s really focused and really happy he is here. “I think for the World Cup 2026, he will be there and be able to play, 100 percent.” Happy Gavi. 🫶 pic.twitter.com/Eh0tos7Uhi — LALIGA English (@LaLigaEN) March 14, 2025 Flick added that Balde was “one of the best” left backs in the world and also praised veteran centre back Inigo Martinez, who was called up for Spain by national team coach Luis de la Fuente. Advertisement “With his attitude and mentality, he’s unbelievably good for every team,” Flick said. Atletico Madrid form guide: W-D-W-L-L Barcelona form guide: W-D-W-W-W Atletico Madrid team news Angel Correa is suspended for the match after his red card in the 2-1 defeat to Getafe last weekend. Koke remains a doubt with a knock while Rodrigo De Paul is set to miss out. Barcelona team news Marc Bernal and Marc-Andre ter Stegen are still long-term absentees with knee injuries, but Andreas Christensen is back in training with the squad. Atletico Madrid’s probable starting lineup: Jan Oblak; Nahuel Molina, Jose Maria Gimenez, Clement Lenglet, Reinildo; Giuliano Simeone, Rodrigo De Paul, Pablo Barrios, Conor Gallagher; Antoine Griezmann, Julian Alvarez Barcelona’s possible starting lineup: Wojciech Szczesny; Jules Kounde, Ronald Araujo, Pau Cubarsi, Alejandro Balde; Frenkie De Jong, Pedri; Lamine Yamal, Dani Olmo, Raphinha; Robert Lewandowski Adblock test (Why?)