Texas Weekly Online

Trump continues to push alternative to controversial visa amid concerns about Chinese influence

Trump continues to push alternative to controversial visa amid concerns about Chinese influence

President Donald Trump is continuing to push for a “gold card” visa that would allow foreign nationals to buy their way into the U.S., replacing a controversial visa scheme that has been dogged for years by concerns about potential abuse by China. Trump again touted his plan for the gold card, which would allow people to buy a pathway to citizenship for $5 million, on “Sunday Morning Futures.” “I believe that Apple and all these companies that can’t get people to come out of college and come because they get thrown out, I think of it, you graduate number one at the Wharton School of Finance or Harvard or Stanford, and you get thrown out of the country. You can’t stay more than one day. And they want to hire these people, but they can’t. They’ve complained to me about it. Now they can buy a gold card, and they can take that gold card and make it a part of their deal to get these top students,” Trump said on Sunday. “You’re going to have a lot of companies buying gold cards. So for $5 million now, it’s a lot of money when you add it up, if we sell a lot of them,” he said, later describing it as a “green card on steroids.” TRUMP TOUTS $5 MILLION ‘GOLD CARD’ AS NEW PATH TO CITIZENSHIP  Host Maria Bartiromo asked Trump about concerns that the Chinese may exploit it. “They may, and they may, but they don’t have to do that. They can do it in other ways,” Trump said. The visa would replace the EB-5 investor visa program. That program was established in the 1990s and typically required an investment of $1 million, but that could be as low as $500,000 in areas classified as high poverty, and the creation of at least 10 jobs. There had been unsuccessful efforts to reform the program in both the Obama and Trump administrations amid concerns that the program had been used by the Chinese Communist Party. “Although the EB-5 program’s goal of stimulating capital investment and job creation in the United States is laudable, it has become clear in recent years that the CCP may be abusing the program to gain access to U.S. permanent residency for their members,” Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee said in 2020. TRUMP DECLARES ‘AMERICA IS BACK’ IN SPEECH BEFORE CONGRESS They cited statistics that show that between 2012 and 2018, nearly 80% of nearly 10,000 visas went to Chinese-born investors and that the majority of investors in the backlog were Chinese. It also involved the creation of “regional centers” that pooled the visa money and funded large investments across the country. While intended to promote growth in poor or rural areas, the drawing of regional maps around specific impoverished pockets was used to pump money into luxury projects in places like New York City and San Francisco. A bipartisan attempt to reform the program was blocked in 2021 and funding for the program was allowed to expire. It was later resurrected in 2022 with reforms introduced by Sens. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Patrick Leahy, D-Vt. The reforms aimed to tackle fraud, and included audits, background checks and site visits for EB-5 projects, as well as tighter definitions of terms like “capital” to prevent abuse. It also increased the level of funding needed for high poverty areas to $800,000. Of the 10,000 EB-5s made available each year, 2,000 will be earmarked for rural or high poverty areas. Provisions also include increased Department of Homeland Security (DHS) powers to vet foreign capital to make sure it is lawfully sourced, and requiring foreign agents and third-party promoters of the program to register with DHS.  CLICK HERE FOR MORE IMMIGRATION COVERAGE However, the EB-5 continues to draw criticism, with some immigration hawks saying it did not solve the fundamental issues with the program. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick recently described the program as “poorly overseen, poorly executed.” Lora Ries, director of the Border Security and Immigration Center at the Heritage Foundation, shared those concerns about EB-5. “With any immigration benefit in America, if you offer it, they will come, and too often seek or use the benefit fraudulently. The EB-5 investor visa program is no exception, as Commerce Secretary Lutnick mentioned. Examples of fraud that program sees include false job creation claims, bogus projects, and pyramid investment schemes,” she said. “Aliens view immigration benefit fraud as low risk, high reward because it is so rarely investigated, let alone punished. It is one reason we have over 9 million immigration benefits applications pending at DHS and another nearly 4 million immigration cases pending at DOJ,” she said.  “It is important to scrutinize the current backlogs for immigration benefit fraud, deny those cases, and deport the alien applicants, which helps accomplish an administration priority – mass deportations,” she added.

GOP gears up to challenge Georgia’s Dem senator in state Trump won by 2%

GOP gears up to challenge Georgia’s Dem senator in state Trump won by 2%

Republicans have identified Georgia’s U.S. Senate election in 2026 as an opportunity to widen their margin over Democrats in the U.S. Senate. After Democratic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen’s announcement that she will not seek re-election in New Hampshire, all eyes are on Georgia’s Senate race. “Every battleground state — Georgia, Michigan, New Hampshire and Minnesota – is in play, and we play to win,” Nick Puglia, National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) regional press secretary, said in a statement to Fox News Digital after Shaheen’s announcement Wednesday.  Sen. Jon Ossoff, D-Ga., the first-term senator who helped secure a Democratic majority in 2021, is one of the only Democratic senators up for re-election in a state President Donald Trump won in 2024. Trump won battleground Georgia by just over two percentage points in 2024.  “Jon Ossoff is a Democrat with extreme and reckless policies,” Puglia added. “Ossoff wants biological males to be allowed to compete in women’s sports, took a backseat after the tragic murder of Laken Riley and is too weak to stand up to pro-Hamas radicals in his party. Georgians deserve better.”  LONGTIME DEMOCRATIC SEN. JEANNE SHAHEEN NOT SEEKING RE-ELECTION IN 2026 IN KEY NORTHEASTERN SWING STATE Ossoff’s office did not reply to Fox News Digital’s request for comment by the deadline of this article.  Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, the popular term-limited Republican, is the GOP’s ideal candidate in 2026 as it challenges Ossoff and seeks to expand its 53-47 Senate majority.  While the governor has not announced a formal bid for the U.S. Senate in 2026, Kemp acknowledged in an interview with Fox News Digital last month, “We’ll have something to say on that down the road.” TOP GOP RECRUIT FOR CRUCIAL 2026 SENATE RACE HINTS WHEN HE WILL MAKE AN ANNOUNCEMENT “We need to flip that seat,” Kemp said. “We should have a Republican in that seat, and I believe we’ll have one after the ’26 election.” Ossoff, 38, became the first millennial elected to the U.S. Senate in 2021, unseating former Sen. David Perdue, R-Ga., in a runoff election.  During his fourth year in office, Ossoff highlighted “historic upgrades for Georgia’s infrastructure through the bipartisan infrastructure law,” his commitment to supporting Georgia veterans, efforts to secure relief after Hurricane Helene, his public safety initiatives and work to expand healthcare across the state.  Ossoff has issued a series of press releases countering Trump’s executive actions since he returned to the White House in January. Ossoff has led efforts to unfreeze federal funding, raised concern over programs cut by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and rejected the Department of Veterans Affairs’ plans to cut 80,000 jobs.  The Georgia senator voted against a bill last week that would have prevented biological males from participating in women’s and girls sports, telling The Atlanta Journal-Constitution in a statement, “This bill was overreach.”  The New York Times reported last month that a bipartisan group of Jewish leaders in Atlanta asked Kemp to consider running for Ossoff’s senate seat. The letter came after Ossoff voted to block a weapons transfer to Israel and criticized Israel’s handling of the war in Gaza. Ossoff is Georgia’s first Jewish senator.  Ossoff was one of 12 Senate Democrats who voted to pass the Laken Riley Act, named for the 22-year-old nursing student who was murdered by an illegal immigrant while jogging at the University of Georgia last year. The Laken Riley Act imposes increased penalties for undocumented immigrants who commit crimes in the United States. Prior to serving in the U.S. Senate, Ossoff narrowly lost his campaign to represent Georgia’s 6th Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives in 2017.  In addition to Georgia, the NRSC has identified New Hampshire, Michigan and Minnesota as key battleground states for the 2026 midterm elections.  NRSC CHAIR REVEALS HOW MANY GOP SENATE SEATS HE’S GUNNING FOR DURING 2026 MIDTERMS Shaheen’s announcement that she will not seek re-election in New Hampshire could further complicate the Democrats’ efforts to regain control of the U.S. Senate. However, it has been 15 years since Republicans last won a Senate election in New Hampshire.  “Another one! Shaheen’s retirement is welcome news for Granite Staters eager for new leadership. New Hampshire has a proud tradition of electing commonsense Republicans and will do so again in 2026,” Sen. Tim Scott, the NRSC chair, said in a statement to Fox News after her announcement.  Republicans also have their eyes on Michigan, where Democratic Sen. Gary Peters announced he will not seek re-election next year. Trump won Michigan by just over a percentage point in 2024. Sen. Tina Smith, D-Minn., also took her name out of the running for another term in the U.S. Senate. Trump lost Minnesota by over four points to former Vice President Kamala Harris and running mate Tim Walz, Minnesota’s governor.

Meta unveils new community notes program; will not apply distribution penalties nor limit flow of information

Meta unveils new community notes program; will not apply distribution penalties nor limit flow of information

EXCLUSIVE: Meta is launching its new community notes program next week to replace its biased, third-party fact-checking program. The company’s global affairs officer, Joel Kaplan, told Fox News Digital in an exclusive interview that content with community notes applied will not be limited in distribution to users nor have penalties imposed.  Meta, in January, ended its fact-checking program and lifted restrictions on speech on the platform to “restore free expression” across Facebook, Instagram and Meta platforms. Meta said its content moderation practices had “gone too far.”  META ENDS FACT-CHECKING PROGRAM AS ZUCKERBERG VOWS TO RESTORE FREE EXPRESSION ON FACEBOOK, INSTAGRAM “We had a third-party, fact-checking program, which was well-intentioned at the beginning but proved to be really prone to partisan political bias and destroyed a lot of trust and credibility in the system,” Kaplan said. “We decided to replace that system, starting in the United States with a crowdsourced, community-based approach, which we announced in January.”  Next week, Meta is opening the new community notes program for users to write and rate notes on content across Facebook, Instagram and Threads.  “We’ve developed a waitlist that actually has a couple of hundred thousand people on it, a broad cross-section of Americans who use Facebook and Instagram who want to be able to add context to the content that they are seeing when they think it is misleading,” Kaplan said. “And the great thing about community notes is that, first of all, instead of a handful of so-called experts like the third-party fact-checkers, it’s our community, which is broad based, ideologically diverse people from across the political spectrum.” Meta will begin by gradually and randomly admitting people off the waitlist and will take time to test the writing and rating system before any notes are published. Meta will not decide what gets rated or what gets written but rather the contributors from the Facebook, Instagram and Threads communities, the company told Fox News Digital.  Kaplan told Fox News Digital that Meta is borrowing the algorithm used by X, which the company has open-sourced from its system.  META POLICY CHIEF SAYS DECISION TO END DEI ENSURES COMPANY HIRES ‘THE MOST TALENTED PEOPLE’ “The algorithm only applies a community note when people who normally disagree agree that something is misleading,” Kaplan said. “And that’s the way that you ensure that the bias that crept into the third-party fact-checking system isn’t a part of this system.”  Kaplan said all content is subject to community notes, except for advertisements. But contributors can submit notes on almost any other form of content, including posts by Meta, Meta executives, politicians and other public figures.  “Another thing that it won’t do that the third-party fact-checking program did is it doesn’t apply any penalty,” Kaplan explained.  “The third-party fact-checking program, in addition to the bias, had penalties attached to it, where if something was rated false, we would dramatically reduce its distribution,” Kaplan continued. “And that turned a program that was intended to be about providing additional information into one that was essentially a censorship tool.” Meta’s third-party fact-checking program was put in place after the 2016 election and had been used to “manage content” and misinformation on its platforms, largely due to “political pressure,” executives said, but they admitted the system had “gone too far.” “The community notes program is just about providing additional information and context so people can make their own decisions, but it doesn’t apply any distribution penalties or limit the flow of information through the algorithm,” Kaplan said. Under the third-party fact-checking program, fact-checked posts often had their distribution reduced across platforms. Meta said that will not be the case with posts that have community notes applied to them, and it will not affect who can see the content or how widely it can be shared.  MARK ZUCKERBERG’S PHILANTHROPY ENDS DEI PROGRAMS, SOCIAL ADVOCACY EFFORTS Kaplan said Meta believes users “should see both the posts and then also the additional information to give them context about the post.”  “We want to make sure that the full range of information is provided,” he said. The community notes will be limited to 500 characters and will be written by contributors in the Meta community notes program.  “Individual members of the community will write and submit notes, and then other members of the community will get to say, ‘Yeah, that looks right to me,’ within the system,” he said. “And once the algorithm determines that it received a critical mass of support from people who usually disagree, that is the check on the bias.” “All the changes we made in January were in the service of returning to our roots of free expression, and the third-party fact-checking program has become an impediment to that,” Kaplan said. “A community-based system that empowers our users to just provide additional information that people find helpful, I think, is a really big improvement on voice and expression on the platform.”  As for who can contribute community notes, Meta told Fox News Digital that contributors must be over 18 years old and have an account that is more than six months old and in good standing. The user must also have either a verified phone number or be enrolled in two-factor authentication. The community notes feature will be available in six languages commonly used in the United States to start, including English, Spanish, Chinese, Vietnamese, French and Portuguese. Meta will expand to other languages down the line.

‘Never forgotten’: More military families could soon qualify for this special benefit

‘Never forgotten’: More military families could soon qualify for this special benefit

EXCLUSIVE: A new proposal would expand which military families will qualify for lifetime National Park passes. The “Benefits that Endure for Lifetimes of Service (BELO’S) Act” would apply to Gold Star families and service members who died from a “service-connected illnesses or service-related incident,” like a training accident while in the United States, serious illness or an injury.  Currently, Gold Star families and veterans can obtain a free lifetime pass, as well as anybody with a “permanent disability” regardless of military status.  BURGUM SAYS INTERIOR DEPARTMENT ‘COMPLETELY EMBRACING THE DOGE EFFORT’ The legislation is named after the late U.S. Army First Sergeant Marc Belo, who died from cancer related to his military service in May 2024. Belo worked closely alongside Rep. Gabe Evans, R-Colo., the bill’s sponsor, including on a deployment in 2012. “I’m proud to introduce the BELOS Act, honoring my dear friend and fellow solider, First Sergeant Marc Belo,” Evans told Fox News Digital in a statement. “Marc was a giant— a true leader, role model, and the godfather of flying in our unit. When Marc passed away last year, he left a hole in the hearts of all who knew him. I’m proud to honor him by ensuring families of fallen heroes are never forgotten,” he added.  ‘FULL COURT PRESS’: FRESHMAN GOP LAWMAKER REVEALS BLUEPRINT TO FLIP SCRIPT ON GREEN ENERGY MANDATES For the current edibility, the passes are offered as part of an effort with the National Parks Service and Operation Live Well, but the bill modifies the Federal Land Recreation Enhancement Act to go beyond just those who died in the usual “qualifying situation” that Gold Star families are determined by. AMERICAN FLAG HUNG UPSIDE DOWN IN YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARK IN PROTEST OVER LAYOFFS The bill is co-sponsored by Rep. Jimmy Panetta, D-Calif., and has been referred to the House Natural Resources Committee and the House Agriculture Committee. 

Federal judge orders Elon Musk, DOGE to reveal plans to downsize government, identify all employees

Federal judge orders Elon Musk, DOGE to reveal plans to downsize government, identify all employees

An Obama-appointed federal judge ordered Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to reveal its plans to downsize the government and to identify all its employees, among other actions.  The directives from U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan come as 14 Democratic state attorneys general are suing President Donald Trump, Musk and DOGE, arguing that Musk is unconstitutionally wielding power, according to Politico. Chutkan gave Musk and DOGE three weeks to produce the information, which ultimately will help her decide whether to block DOGE’s operations altogether, it added.  The ruling issued Wednesday requires Musk and DOGE to, among other directives:  DOGE PROTESTERS RALLY OUTSIDE KEY DEPARTMENT AFTER EMPLOYEES ARE TOLD NOT TO REPORT TO WORK  DOGE AND AGENCIES CANCEL 200,000 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CREDIT CARDS  The directives also call for admissions that “Elon Musk has directed actions of DOGE personnel” and that “Elon Musk is not supervised by any Officer of the United States other than the President of the United States.”  The White House did not immediately respond Thursday to a request for comment by Fox News Digital.  “The burden to Defendants is minimized by the narrow time period for responsive materials, the exclusion of electronic communications, explicitly exempting President Trump from the requests, extending Defendants’ time to respond, and denying Plaintiffs’ request to notice depositions,” Chutkan said in her decision.  “Plantiffs’ Discovery Requests shall be limited to information and materials regarding agencies, employees, contracts, grants, federal funding, legal agreements, databases, or data management systems that involve or engage with Plaintiff States; including entities and institutions operated or funded by Plaintiff States,” she added.

Senate Republicans coin ‘Schumer shutdown’ ahead of critical vote on Trump spending bill

Senate Republicans coin ‘Schumer shutdown’ ahead of critical vote on Trump spending bill

Republicans are ramping up pressure on Senate Democrats ahead of a vote on the House-passed stopgap spending bill to keep the government open, even dubbing a potential funding lapse as a “Schumer shutdown.” “If they want to shut it down, it’s on them,” Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., told reporters. “That’ll be a Schumer shutdown.” Majority Whip John Barrasso, R-Wyo., recently stressed this point in an op-ed for Fox News, writing, “If there is a shutdown, it will be driven by and directed by the Democrats.” CANADA EXPLOITING ‘LOOPHOLE’ HURTING US DAIRY FARMERS AMID TRUMP TARIFFS, SENATORS SAY Earlier in the week, House Republicans passed a short-term spending bill, called a continuing resolution (CR), which would keep spending levels the same as fiscal year 2024 until Oct. 1. If a spending bill is not passed by Friday, the government will enter into a partial shutdown. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., took to the chamber floor on Wednesday and said, “Republicans do not have the votes in the Senate to invoke cloture on the House CR,” which he slammed for being a “partisan path” to funding the government.  The resolution would notably keep spending levels as they were when former President Joe Biden was in office.  Instead, Schumer said Senate Democrats were interested in passing a “clean” monthlong stopgap bill.  FETTERMAN MAVERICK PERSONA DOESN’T TRANSLATE AS SENATOR HELPS BLOCK TRANS SPORTS BILL This was echoed by Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., who said Wednesday, “Those votes exist on a 30-day CR, without a doubt.” “If the Republicans would bring it to the floor,” he added.  But Republicans have made it clear they want to move forward with the House-passed bill. “The thing that bugs me about this is, keep in mind, this same CR was voted for with these spending levels [in] September and December. So what’s the difference now?” Mullin said. “These same employees that they’ve been fighting for supposedly, now they’re going to yield literally all the authority to the White House because the White House is going to be able to deem them essential and non-essential,” he said.  MEET SANDRA WHITEHOUSE, WHOSE HUSBAND’S VOTES FUNNELED MILLIONS INTO NGO THAT PAYS HER Mullin said Schumer refused to bring 11 of 12 appropriations bills to the Senate floor for votes in the last Congress, despite them having been advanced out of committee. The senator further faulted Democrats for not engaging in negotiations on a spending deal until the last minute. He said Senate Appropriations Committee ranking member Patty Murray, D-Wash., only recently came to the table to discuss it with Chair Susan Collins, R-Maine. A spokesperson for Murray told Fox News Digital in a statement, “For months, Senator Murray has remained at the table ready to negotiate and pass bipartisan funding bills—and she stands ready to work with the Senate Republican majority to immediately pass a short-term stopgap to prevent a shutdown. In fact, she and her Democratic colleagues pressed to get government funding done in December—but Speaker Johnson chose to kick the can down the road and walk away from bipartisan talks.” A representative for Schumer did not provide comment in time for publication.  Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., sounded off on the potential funding lapse, saying, “We all know the Democrats want a shutdown.”  “The American people agree with reducing federal spending, getting this country back on the right track. And the Democrats are so opposed to it, they’re willing to push to a shutdown. It’s all on them,” she told reporters.  GEORGIA REPUBLICANS DON’T RULE OUT SENATE BIDS AS POPULAR GOP GOVERNOR REMAINS UNDECIDED Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., said in a statement, “Republicans are doing the right thing for the American people by making sure our government stays open.” However, “Democrats are sacrificing the good of hardworking Americans on the altar of their hatred for Donald Trump. They should reverse course and join Republicans in keeping the lights on in the federal government. Enough with the political games.” Votes on beginning the process to consider the stopgap bill are expected to occur on Thursday, depending on whether Republicans and Democrats come to an agreement to skip lengthy procedural votes that are routine for most votes.